|
|
|
|
| Belly Dance Wraps & Belts |
|
|
HomeBelly DanceBelly Dance Wraps & BeltsWomen's "Tap Flex" Laceless Split-Sole Tap Shoe |
|
|  | | | Customer Reviews: | | | Average Customer Review: ( 3 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3 of 3 found the following review helpful:
 ABSOLUTELY AMAZINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNG!! Apr 26, 2008
By H. Ngo
"Happy Feet"
These Bloch tap shoes are so incredibly amazing. I've tried on Leo's, and Capezios, but when the Bloch's come around I LOVE THEM. They're extremely light, soft, comfortable, and feel like velvet underneath. They're also very flexible too that I've tried to stand on my toes... NICE!!! All I can say more is I can dance or walk in these shoes for hrs if not days, though slipping them on is a bit tricky, but once they're on... they fit like velvet gloves. I wear street shoe size women 6-61/2, and ordered 6 1/2M with these tap. To me they fit fine!!! I like the snuggy fit but still very comfortable. But i saw some people complaining about how they were unable to get the shoes on and had to order 2-3 size bigger. Don't know why... But i think to be safe you can order half a size or 1 size bigger max.
1 of 1 found the following review helpful:
bedroom slippers!!! Apr 05, 2009
By hard core consumer
Best tap shoes ever! Very comfortable - like bedroom slippers. I started wearing them. Then my daughter. Now, all her friends wear them. The teacher loves them because costume changes are much easier - and no laces to trip on!
 Do not order if you may have to return them Nov 07, 2010
By notahappycustomer
The shoes were great but I had to return them for another size. I was never informed they could only refund my payment not exchange. I followed return/exchange instructions that were placed in the box. Then Dancewear Solutions claim they never got the shoes back and Amazon refuses to refund my payment so I have been screwed out of my money. I will never order anything from amazon or dancewear solutions again.
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
